technologyDo

Type your need. technologyDo delivers the solution. No IT team required.

An IT department made of AI agents, working under rules a bank auditor would sign. You describe the outcome. We ship it, with the receipts.

From a typed request to an audited solution A request typed in plain language, “a project-spend tracker, SEC 17a-4 retention, no PII in logs”, crosses the policy boundary into AITLA. The boundary is made of four policy files: mandate, governance, communication and model selection. Inside it, agents with separate roles work in order: Architecture designs, Developer builds, Tester tests, Auditor approves, Deployment ships and Operations monitors, and a retrospective feeds back to Architecture. A human can override at the boundary. Two things leave: the deployed project-spend tracker, and an audit record written at every step, which shows the self-approval was refused. request > a project-spend tracker, SEC 17a-4 retention, no PII in logs human override mandate governance communication model selection AITLA policy boundary Architecture designs Developer builds Tester tests Auditor approves Deployment ships Operations monitors retrospective audit record written at every step mandate.check pass design.review pass tests pass self-approval refused auditor.review approved retention SEC 17a-4 pii.in.logs none deployed running project-spend tracker From a typed request to an audited solution A request typed in plain language, “a project-spend tracker, SEC 17a-4 retention, no PII in logs”, crosses the policy boundary into AITLA. The boundary is made of four policy files: mandate, governance, communication and model selection. Inside it, agents with separate roles work in order: Architecture designs, Developer builds, Tester tests, Auditor approves, Deployment ships and Operations monitors, and a retrospective feeds back to Architecture. A human can override at the boundary. Two things leave: the deployed project-spend tracker, and an audit record written at every step, which shows the self-approval was refused. request > a project-spend tracker, SEC 17a-4 retention, no PII in logs human override AITLA policy boundary policies: mandate, governance, communication, model selection Architecture designs Developer builds Tester tests Auditor approves Deployment ships Operations monitors retrospective deployed running project-spend tracker audit record written at every step mandate.check pass design.review pass tests pass self-approval refused auditor.review approved retention SEC 17a-4 pii.in.logs none
One request, in. One audited system, out.

You don't want an app. You want the outcome.

Every organisation gets the same two choices. Hire an IT department you can't afford, or buy a tool that almost fits and bend the business around it. There's a third choice now, and most of it is junk: AI app builders that will cheerfully make you anything and hand you a production system nobody can secure, patch or explain to an auditor. Quick to build, expensive to keep alive. In a bank, the average application costs a million dollars a year just to exist. Most never earn it back.

The cost was never the code. It was the coordination.

Managers, analysts, architects, QA, auditors, InfoSec: layers of people whose job is to make sure the other people did theirs. That's what an IT department is. Agents don't need the bureaucracy. They need the rules. AITLA is those rules, written as code, with a swarm of agents working inside them: an architect that designs, a developer that builds, a tester that tests, and an auditor that can say no, and does. No agent approves its own work. Nothing happens off the record. A human can override any of them, and the override goes on the record too.

  • AGD

    the method

    Feedback first, documentation second, tests before code, and nobody marks their own homework.

    See it work →

  • AITLA

    the architecture

    An IT department's roles, lifecycle and chain of command, run by agents.

    How it's built →

  • IntegrityOps

    the controls

    Policy as code, enforced while the work happens, with an audit trail you didn't have to assemble.

    The controls →

We spent twenty years building the controls. Then we took out the committees.

DVB Bank. Barclays. Deutsche Bank. Scotiabank. RBC. Change approval, separation of duties, escalation, audit. The controls work. Regulators trust them. They're also slow, because they run on meetings. IntegrityOps is those controls with the meetings removed.

We use it ourselves.

SigmaScope, a portfolio platform for advisors, was built by a team of AI developers under the rules that became AGD. This website was built by AITLA and is run by it. Every change goes through the same process you'd get, and the audit record is at the bottom of this page.

Got a problem worth solving and a regulator worth satisfying?

We're taking on a small number of clients. Tell us the outcome you want. We'll show you the audit trail.